Every large organisation has a shadow IT problem, whether the leadership team knows about it or not. Employees adopt tools and services outside approved channels because they need to get work done. Marketing teams sign up for project management platforms. Sales departments spin up CRM trials. Development teams deploy test servers on personal cloud accounts. Each of these creates risk that the security team cannot see or manage.

    Shadow IT thrives when official procurement processes feel slow, rigid, or disconnected from real business needs. When employees wait weeks for IT to provision a simple tool, they find faster alternatives on their own. This behaviour is rarely malicious. People simply want to do their jobs efficiently. The security implications, however, can be severe.

    Unapproved applications often store sensitive data without adequate protection. A marketing team using an unsanctioned file-sharing service might upload customer lists, campaign strategies, or financial projections. If that service suffers a breach, the organisation bears the consequences even though IT never authorised or even knew about the platform.

    Authentication sprawl compounds the problem. Employees create accounts on dozens of external services using corporate email addresses. Many reuse passwords across these accounts. A breach of any single shadow IT platform can expose credentials that grant access to core business systems. The attack chain from compromised shadow IT account to full network breach is shorter than most leaders realise.

    Cloud infrastructure presents particular concerns. Developers spinning up virtual machines or storage buckets outside the corporate cloud environment often skip fundamental security configurations. Publicly accessible databases, unencrypted storage, and overly permissive access policies appear regularly in shadow cloud deployments.

    Expert Commentary

    William Fieldhouse | Director of Aardwolf Security Ltd

    “Shadow IT is one of the most underestimated risks we encounter during assessments. Departments spin up cloud services, install unapproved tools, and create data flows that bypass every security control the organisation has invested in. You cannot defend what you do not know exists.”

    Regular internal network penetration testing frequently uncovers shadow IT assets that nobody on the security team knew about. Test servers running outdated software, rogue wireless access points, and unauthorised network appliances all surface during thorough assessments. These discoveries alone justify the investment in regular testing.

    Addressing shadow IT requires a balance between control and enablement. Organisations that respond with blanket restrictions simply push the problem further underground. A better approach involves understanding why employees seek alternative tools, streamlining official procurement, and offering approved alternatives that meet genuine business needs.

    Technology solutions help with discovery and monitoring. Cloud access security brokers can detect when employees use unauthorised SaaS applications. Network monitoring tools identify rogue devices and unexpected traffic patterns. Scheduled vulnerability scanning services reveal assets connected to your network that should not be there.

    Clear policies set expectations without stifling productivity. Employees should understand what constitutes shadow IT, why it creates risk, and how to request new tools through official channels. When the approved process is fast and responsive, the incentive to go rogue diminishes significantly.

    Ignoring shadow IT does not make it disappear. It grows quietly until a breach forces it into the spotlight. Proactive discovery and governance cost a fraction of what an incident driven by unknown, unprotected assets demands

     

    Leave A Reply